Update: Monsanto Agrees to Disagree, Basically

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
Monsanto has finally responded to the argument I shared with you a few weeks ago, which posits that their scheme of licensing agreements for their GMO seeds egregiously overstates the protections they enjoy under U.S. patent law and is therefore a fraudulent attempt to unlawfully restrain trade. Their cursory one-paragraph letter duly recognizes that their corporate policy differs from our plain reading of the relevant statutes, but seemingly does not bother to counter the contentions I set forth:

Final 1.jpg
Their continuing reliance on Bowman and J.E.M. to vindicate their practices, even though both are materially irrelevant to the current controversy, may imply that they believe this dispute too trivial to require their further attention -- or it may signal that those two inapplicable precedents are the only legal foundation for their shaky scheme. Either way, it appears that Monsanto and "Conscious Commitment" have reached an impasse.

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Update: Monsanto Agrees to Disagree, Basically.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.planetgreen.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/163

Leave a comment


Type the characters you see in the picture above.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Katrianna Brisack published on August 26, 2016 7:55 AM.

Why We Stand For BDS was the previous entry in this blog.

Bayer-Monsanto Buyout: Dangerous Waste of $66B is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.